COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
2001 Needs Assessment Study
Focus Group Report
ANNE MARIE GOLD
Library Management Consulting
P. O. Box 1294 · Lafayette, CA 94549 -1294
Tel: 925/283-0970 · Fax: 925/283-2053 · Email:
agold@ccnet.comCOUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
2001 NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
APPENDIX A – FOCUS GROUP QUESTIONS *
APPENDIX B – FOCUS GROUP INSTRUCTIONS *
APPENDIX C – FOCUS GROUP REPORTS *
In the fall of 2000 the Council of California County Law Librarians contracted for consultant services to perform a legal information needs assessment for the County Law Libraries. The purpose of the study was to assist key legal information providers in the State of California to assess the new environment for legal information needs and develop a strategic plan to most effectively meet those rapidly changing needs, while at the same addressing issues of reducing funding. As part of the needs assessment process, focus groups for law library users and non-users were required.
The focus group questions were developed by the consultant and reviewed by the Advisory Group and revised based on its input. The questions were intended to elicit informed discussion on the various topics to be covered and to create a balanced and realistic set of responses to issues facing the law libraries today. The focus group questions are included as Appendix A.
The Advisory Group defined where to hold the focus groups and which counties should be included in each group. The intent was to cover all geographic areas of the state in order to get as broad based input as possible.
Each focus group was to be hosted by a County Law Library that was responsible for all logistics for the group. The host library was responsible for identifying the participants who were supposed to be representative of the general population served by the law libraries in the counties covered by the group, including a cross section of users and non-users. However, in general the participants tended to be law library users. The host library focus group instructions are included as Appendix B.
Seventeen focus groups were held throughout the state from May through July 2001.
|
FOCUS GROUP |
LOCATION |
COUNTIES COVERED |
DATE |
FACILITATOR |
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES |
|
Alameda County – Alameda |
Alameda County Law Library, Oakland |
Alameda |
June 29, 2001 |
Linda Crowe |
10 |
|
Alameda County – Contra Costa |
Alameda County Law Library, Oakland |
Contra Costa |
June 29, 2001 |
Linda Crowe |
2 |
|
Butte County |
Butte County Law Library, Oroville |
Butte |
May 3, 2001 |
Anne Marie Gold |
2 |
|
Humboldt County |
Humboldt County Law Library, Eureka |
Humboldt |
July 19, 2001 |
Anne Marie Gold |
9 |
|
Los Angeles County - 1 |
Los Angeles County Law Library, Los Angeles |
Los Angeles |
June 28, 2001 |
Anne Campbell |
7 |
|
Los Angeles County - 2 |
Los Angeles County Law Library, Los Angeles |
Los Angeles |
June 28, 2001 |
Anne Campbell |
5 |
|
Orange County |
Orange County Law Library, Santa Ana |
Orange |
June 14, 2001 |
Anne Campbell |
9 |
|
Placer County |
Placer County Law Library, Auburn |
Placer, Yuba |
June 26, 2001 |
Linda Crowe |
6 |
|
Riverside County |
Riverside County Law Library, Riverside |
Riverside, San Bernardino |
June 22, 2001 |
Anne Campbell |
11 |
|
Sacramento County |
Sacramento County Law Library, Sacramento |
Sacramento, San Joaquin, Yolo |
July 9. 2001 |
Anne Marie Gold |
12 |
|
San Diego County– Central |
San Diego County Law Library, Main Branch, San Diego |
San Diego |
June 16, 2001 |
Anne Campbell |
14 |
|
San Diego County– North |
San Diego County Law Library, Vista, Vista |
San Diego |
June 21, 2001 |
Anne Campbell |
5 |
|
San Francisco County |
San Francisco County Law Library |
San Francisco |
June 20, 2001 |
Linda Crowe |
12 |
|
San Mateo County |
San Mateo County Law Library |
Monterey, San Mateo |
May 19, 2001 |
Linda Crowe |
6 |
|
Santa Barbara County |
Santa Barbara County Law Library, Santa Barbara |
Santa Barbara, Ventura |
June 30, 2001 |
Anne Campbell |
6 |
|
Sonoma County |
Sonoma County Law Library, Santa Rosa |
Lake, Marin, Napa, Sonoma |
June 22, 2001 |
Linda Crowe |
14 |
|
Tulare County |
Tulare County Public Library, Visalia |
Fresno, Kern, Kings, Tulare |
June 28, 2001 |
Anne Campbell |
11 |
Initially two additional focus groups were scheduled in Stanislaus County and an additional group in Sacramento for governmental agencies. The Stanislaus County focus group was cancelled due to the inability to identify participants. The decision was made to eliminate the second Sacramento group as it was felt that the needs of the governmental agencies would be covered by the one general focus group.
Three separate experienced facilitators conducted the focus groups. Anne Campbell facilitated eight focus groups in the southern half of the state, Linda Crowe facilitated six focus groups in the central and northern portions of the state, and Anne Marie Gold facilitated three focus groups in the far northern areas of the state.
The focus groups were attended by 131 participants, with the number of participants ranging from 2 to 14, with an average of 8 per group. The participants were from 27 different counties; 10 of the focus groups were single county groups and the remaining 7 groups had from 2 to 4 counties represented. The participant included a broad cross section of users with the variety of affiliations ranging from:
Not all attendees indicated their affiliation so it is not possible to correctly estimate the percentage from each type. Each individual report indicates the type of attendees at each group session.
The reports from each individual focus group are included as Appendix C.
The focus groups presented a mixed picture of use and interest in the services of the law libraries. The themes that dominated the discussions were:
The key findings based on the responses are:
The major reasons that participants noted for their attendance included:
The positive themes that emerged were appreciation for the resources and services of the law libraries and concern about future options.
The range of responses was from no familiarity to extremely familiar with more participants indicating that they were somewhat familiar. Participants also commented on the impact of digital resources on reducing familiarity with the law library and the increased use – and familiarity by – pro pers over the past few years. Some participants noted that they personally did not use the library but did refer people to it. Other factors affecting familiarity included location and access to other law libraries. Some participants noted that they felt the public awareness of the collections and services of the law libraries in general was lacking.
Because the majority of participants were occasional to active users of law library collections and services, the familiarity level was generally high, although there were significant numbers of comments that familiarity was decreasing due to increased use of digital resources in other venues.
Use by participants, excluding library staff, ranged from several times a day to only three to four times per year. Again, given the makeup of the participant group, the use level was generally high, in the range of at least once a week for the majority of participants.
The materials that participants noted using focused on:
Interestingly, the use of electronic resources and/or the online catalog while at the library was not mentioned by a majority of participants, although some participants did note that they used the library’s website as a portal to legal information on the Web.
The services that participants most frequently noted using were:
There were consistent references made to the extremely helpful nature of staff assistance in the library including comments about the depth of research that library staff undertook on behalf of users. Telephone reference was the second most frequently mentioned service, with one participant noting that he had been a user of the law library for five years but that this [attendance at the focus group] was the first time he had ever actually been in the library.
Non-users were definitely in the minority among participants but when asked to define why they did not use the library a variety of reasons resulted, including:
Other comments included notes that new attorneys and pro pers rely more heavily on the services and materials than do more experienced attorneys or attorneys in law firms.
The options most frequently mentioned by participants included:
The mix was generally to use digital resources, other law libraries and a personal network for referrals.
The responses on whether participants referred people were mixed. The areas of referral were generally in areas frequently covered by self-help legal materials, such as family law, landlord/tenant, employment/housing, bankruptcy, etc. and forms in general. Many participants noted an increase in the number of pro pers using the law library, who are essentially self-referred but some participants noted concerns with referring people due to the perceived inability of lay persons to effectively use the resources of the law library. Language and literacy as potential barriers for some referrals were noted. Public library participants particularly noted that they refer people to the law library because of the level of expertise therein. A few attorney participants noted that they refer clients to the law library when they can’t afford their services.
The responses about new services and materials clearly identified three major themes, including:
A differentiation between what the legal professional and the pro per user would want was identified, with the legal professional more concerned with hours of access and specialty materials and the pro per user more concerned with staff assistance and self-help materials. Another differentiation was between the larger law libraries where the identified needs were for more esoteric materials and the smaller libraries where the needs were for more basic resources. Other areas commented on included circulation of materials, rush services and classes for users.
The clear mandate was for more computers with online access to legal resources and the Internet. Frequent mention was made of access to Westlaw and Lexis/Nexis, either by personal password or on a free or reduced fee basis. Comments were made about developing joint purchasing for online contracts. Classes on how to do legal research online were frequently mentioned, as well as the need for online catalogs or better interfaces to existing online catalogs. Some participants noted that they use digital resources primarily in their own offices and come to the library for print resources. A number of participants noted that access to the Internet would be increased as the result of InFoPeople grants to law libraries this year.
Comments relating to accessibility of higher shelving were frequently heard, as well as concerns about parking access. Several participants noted a need for more space to spread out to work, as well as quiet space in which to work with a colleague or in which they would not be disturbed by noise from other users. The location within the courthouse was discussed as possibly intimidating to the lay user. Several participants noted the need for maps outlining the physical layout of the library for users.
Only about half the participants who were not library staff were aware of the primary funding source for county law libraries from civil filing fees. A number of participants had no awareness of the specific funding source but assumed some type of general public funding. Suggestions were elicited about potential funding sources including such as fundraising, Friends groups and Bar Association funds. Some groups discussed reasons for the decline in filing fees.
In general, the participants perceived several ways in which reduced funding has affected collections and services:
The impacts of such cutbacks were identified in various ways:
However, some participants did note that they perceived an increase in digital resources that enhanced their use of law library services.
The range of general comments was broad, including:
APPENDIX A – FOCUS GROUP QUESTIONS
************************************************************************
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Interview Questions
APPENDIX B – FOCUS GROUP INSTRUCTIONS
************************************************************************
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
Needs Assessment Study Host Library Focus Group Responsibilities
Each focus group should have between 10–20 participants. The host library is responsible for identifying the participants. The participants should be representative of the general population served by the County Law Library, including a cross section of current County Law Library users and non-users.
For those libraries hosting a multi-county focus group that is to include participants from other counties in addition to their own, it is the responsibility of the hosting library to attempt to insure that participants from those other counties are included.
The host library is responsible for publicity for the focus group, inviting participants by letter and signing up participants. Depending on the user/non-user base of library, the library can choose various options to identify/invite participants such as:
It will be at the choice of the hosting library how they identify and invite participants, with the outcome being a good cross section. For those libraries hosting multi-county focus groups, attempts should be made to contact the County Law Library or other resources in the other counties to invite participants.
The day before the focus group the host library should contact all participants who are scheduled to attend to reconfirm their attendance at the group.
The host library is responsible for providing the meeting room for the focus group. The meeting room ideally should be in the library or nearby. The meeting room should accommodate up to 20 people with room for both a facilitator and recorder, as well as 1-2 flip chart easels. If wall space is available to post flip chart pages, that would be helpful. Generally, the best set up for a focus group is having participants sit around a table, rather than classroom or theatre style.
The host library is responsible for providing all needed supplies for the focus group, including:
The host library is responsible for providing a recorder for the focus group. The role of the recorder is to write down on the flip charts the comments of the focus group participants. The comments do not have to be captured verbatim but rather the sense of the meeting is what needs to be written down. The recorder does not participate in the focus group but simply records it. The recorder should plan to meet with the focus group facilitator shortly before the meeting to review the questions and recording process, as well as prepare the flip charts for the meeting by numbering the pages and writing the specific focus group questions on separate pages. The recorder should also be available to work with the facilitator for a short time after the meeting as needed to clarify the information recorded. The focus group facilitator will take the sheets at the conclusion of the meeting.
Recording a focus group is not as easy a skill as it sounds so the choice of the recorder in an important one. There may be someone in your community who is skilled at recording meetings that you want to invite to record this focus group. An honorarium of $100 can be paid to the recorder is this would assist in recruiting a qualified individual. If you are going to be paying the honorarium, please contact Anne Marie Gold directly about payment arrangements.
Anne Marie Gold will develop the focus group question instrument. The focus group instrument will consist of 7 – 10 open-ended questions, intended to solicit significant discussion on each topic and elicit a balanced, realistic and authentic response from the participants. The instrument will gather information on the current use patterns of county law libraries, the preferred use patterns and the general perception and awareness of the services of county law libraries. Each focus group participant should be given a copy of the questions that will be asked so they can be ready to provide good answers. The facilitator for your focus group will have an original copy of the questions when she arrives for your meeting; the host library is responsible for making copies then for the participants.
The host library is responsible for providing light refreshments, if possible, for the focus group participants. Depending on the time of day, this can be coffee and muffins for a morning group, or cold sodas/juice and cookies for an afternoon group.
After the focus group, the host library is responsible for sending a short thank you to all participants, thanking them for their input, using contact information from the sign in sheet. When the focus group concludes, a copy of the sign in sheet should be given to the facilitator.
APPENDIX C – FOCUS GROUP REPORTS
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Alameda County Law Library, Oakland
COUNTIES COVERED: Alameda
DATE: June 29, 2001
FACILITATOR: Linda Crowe
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 10
Attendees included:
Bar Association
Paralegal
Attorney – private practice
Law Librarian
Law Library trustee
District Attorney
Public Defender
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
non-commercial uses; very accessible to patrons
N/A
patrons
lemon law, business issues, bankruptcy, electronics copyright, athletic contracts,
international laws, etc.
C. WRAP UP
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS
This is a well-funded, new, attractive facility yet it is still underfunded and will be using reserve funds for the first time. Staff has been cut and space increased. Another thread that runs through the interviews is the dedication of the staff.
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Alameda County Law Library, Oakland
COUNTIES COVERED: Contra Costa
DATE: June 29, 2001
FACILITATOR: Linda Crowe
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 2
Participants included:
Law Library staff member
Law Library Board of Trustees member
Naomi Little is the Manager of the Contra Costa County Law Library.
Not familiar with Alameda.
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Refers users to Alameda
West Contra Costa users, use Alameda County Law Library.
Contra Costa users go to Golden Gate University, USF and Boalt besides Alameda.
Refers to Alameda, especially for out-of-state codes or specific titles she has first checked for.
Would like more Internet connections for public.
Ms. Little feels the collection is well balanced.
More terminals for public
No online materials, only CDs
The library is only 13 years old and all resources are accessible.
Fiche is in locked cabinet, but all users need to do is ask.
There is a Richmond branch in Courthouse with 6-7,000 volumes – mostly CA codes.
Shelves there are too close together for accessible use.
As Manager of Contra Costa Law Library, Ms. Little knows how it is funded.
C. WRAP UP
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS
This library is not the equivalent of San Mateo, San Francisco, Alameda, or Sonoma. It is 13,000 sq. feet with 58,000 volumes plus branch. There is little awareness of the library, and there are 15 to 20 attorneys a day and 10 pro pers.
The Alameda County Law Librarian, Susan Dyer, thought location was a problem, but Ms. Little didn’t agree. Either they should do a large PR campaign or develop a closer partnership with Alameda, perhaps sharing costs and resources of the main library and using Contra Costa as a branch. (This is my thought only.)
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Butte County Law Library, Oroville
COUNTIES COVERED: Butte
DATE: May 3, 2001
FACILITATOR: Anne Marie Gold
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 2
Participants included:
Attorney in private practice
Law Librarian
AMG – We’re doing about twenty focus groups all over the state. We’re trying to geographically cover as much of the state as we can. We’ve also done a fairly broad based survey of various types of groups or organizations that would refer people to the county law library. We sent out surveys to every bar association in the state, the DA’s, and we got some pretty good broad based information back from them. I have done a lot of work with county law libraries and what we’re looking for in the focus groups is kind of more, I want to say anecdotal, but kind of just a real sense of what people are seeing as the issues within the county law libraries. The real idea is to kind of bring us all together and say you know, what do we need to do to make our county law libraries better?
JAZ – The libraries of northern CA are all linked to the library of CA. Butte County Law Library is linked to the Library of CA, so librarians could guide patrons through the web page to the links I have and they could click on information if longing of judicial counsel. I want to hold that our clerk’s office, in helping the public, can…at that meeting…we were providing (unbundled?) legal services here…
DH – That could be bad…
JAZ - Very much so, because I’m not covered by insurance…
DH – Yes, and they’re using you too. They love to have you to send people to…to give any advice on which form packet to buy, because they think that’s legal advice, but I’ve heard them say, go down to the Law Library and ask John. Which is great, because I don’t think you’re going to get the clerks to make even those basic judgment calls...because they’re so drilled at answering no…
JAZ - …actually answering this question about The Judicial Council in Chico…the problem is that we only have so much staff, and it’s like all of a sudden, these people are expected to do this job in addition to their regular jobs, especially in the smaller counties…the purpose of my article is to say that if they know the answer, then it’s still not jumping over the line…and I’d like to apply those old guidelines here, because I know I’m not covered by insurance, and I want to help my people, who didn’t know that…to know what to say to people…like I had one, she wants to know if she can sue…we have these panels of attorney volunteers that must have minimum experience requirements…
(The above portion of the tape is barely audible
DH – Referral screens…
JAZ – And they screen the calls…and I think they can’t afford 175…claims there, but I’m going to talk to Sandy. It’s all set. I had originally planned something that could be done for undergraduates in various programs…active state year plans…pro-bono facilitator…actually doing it in that subject.
AMG – No, no we’re doing them all over May and June.
DH – So are you going to a number of different areas?
AMG – Actually I have two other colleagues that I work with who are doing…I’m doing one other one myself up in Eureka, and then I have a colleague who is doing other ones in Northern CA and some in Southern CA, and they’ll be staged over about the next 6 weeks or so.
DH – The response from other counties…probably indicates the status of law libraries…
AMG – Yeah it was interesting, because one of the things we did was an extensive survey, a survey instrument that I sent out to all the county law libraries. Part of what I did is for those county law libraries that generally don’t respond to state library surveys… Every county law library every year…but there’s a full set of ones that never respond. So I said okay, for those that don’t respond or I don’t get it back, I will call them myself and at least either get them to return it or find out what’s going on there. And that was kind of eye opening, because I was in most cases able to at least speak to somebody who indicated that they had at least some knowledge of county law library operations, even though you were just mentioning Glenn having a bunch of books in the back of the courtroom, and I did speak to somebody from Glenn, and basically what I got back from most of these places is that there is not a county law library. That the situation is, as one person put very bluntly, we haven’t bought anything in 5 years so everything is useless here and we’re basically packing it up. We’re not going to provide this. Another county said to me, he was an attorney in private practice in that county, and he had said that basically what I do is that I have the license for Westlaw in this county, and my license allows me to allow other attorneys and the public to use it on an as needed basis and that serves as our county law library. Which I thought serves as an interesting perspective…A couple other cases, at least in one county, it had been contracted out to a private law firm in that county…
DH – To be the law library?
AMG – Yes, and it was the responsibility of the receptionist and she knew nothing about it. You know, so I mean it’s…
DH – Is every county supposed to have a law library?
AMG – Yes. Yes.
DH – In Susanville in Placer County, you used to have to go through what used to be the judge’s reception area to go upstairs, and they had CD-ROM that had codes and cases on it.
AMG – Yes, by law every county, and there is a funny methodology to fund law library services within the county, and then there’s the whole library board and everything, but, you know, I would say, easily at least a dozen to a dozen and a half of our counties really effectively don’t have a functioning county law library. Or it is so blended say with a collection in the judge’s chambers or something like that. It’s not really accessible to either a practicing attorney or a member of the public. There are certainly some real issues with that…a very good county law library…one of the things John and I were talking about is, you know, the other counties around here, for whatever combination of reasons historically they have not chosen to develop county law library services… rather than perhaps try and get them to do it…wouldn’t it make more sense to look at how when you have a thriving operation like this, are there ways to create some partnerships to reach out to some of those counties? To in essence use what you’ve been doing here would be probably a faster way to provide some services there than try to get that county to do it themselves. And the funding mechanism basically is there in every county, to do it, you know…I’d be interested to know what some of those counties are using that portion of the funding for.
DH – Getting the money, they don’t have to apply for it separately?
AMG – No, it is a portion of the civil court filing fee.
DH – But that’s automatic…it goes back to the county…
AMG – It’s supposed to be.
DH – It’s not like the facilitator…
AMG – It’s not a case of applying. It’s money that they have that’s supposed to be allocated by the county auditor for the county law library services.
JAZ – San Pedro County too…they only had seven dollars in filing and really didn’t have an organized county law library…until Trinity said…well Glenn actually could be represented very effectively in Oroville. Colusa, I understand they like their law library, Colusa, it’s a little law library, but they like it. And they eventually hope to have a law library under control as does Plumas County. I’m on a committee with Karen Letgy, a committee to develop CA county law library basic lists…the state law library is selected as basically being the model county law library. But with other media available now, with $20, 000 available a year, this is what you’re going to have…
AMG – You know, I’m wondering if maybe, let’s do this informally, I just know your time is valuable and I hate to keep you waiting that much longer. And Colleen can join us when she comes.
DH – She got stuck on some sort of case…
AMG – Ok. Normally what we do for a focus group…you’ve probably done this type of thing before…there’s just a series of questions and I think some of them, actually what’s been really interesting to me is just listening to kind of your conversation in that it touches on some of the questions that I’ve got here, which really are more about how you use it or you might refer people to use it, or what you’d like to see in terms of changes in the county law library. And that’s really more the kind of information I’m after today. And in view of the fact that we’re sitting here in Oroville, think about kind of not just Butte County, but how this might be representative of some of the other general geographic areas…what is going to help county law library services? So just in general, how familiar do you think you are with the county law library? Do you use it?
DH – I use it quite a bit, and especially I think most private practitioners…I’m family law, a certified family law specialist, so few lawyers update books, cause either they’re researching CD-ROMs or over the Internet. The books that we had before in our offices, most of us just don’t have anymore. And I guess I’m too old, because it’s still hard for me to do substantial research without having an actual book that I can open the pages and flip to. My mind just doesn’t work comfortably. So even when the law library duplicates resources that I have available to me on the online services, I still just like to come here because I feel I can get a better handle on it…plus there are available books here that I just don’t have access to.
AMG – Well that’s good to know.
DH – Plus the court is here, and it makes it possible for me to access the library without having to drive over somewhere else.
AMG – When you have legal information needs that can’t be met by the county law library, where do you go?
DH – Haven’t.
AMG – Okay.
DH – At this point, if it’s not something I have access to either online or through the library, I just haven’t felt a need to use it.
AMG – Okay, well, that’s nice to hear. Definitely. Now this may not be really applicable to you since you’re an attorney with your own practice, but do you ever refer people to the county law library for information?
DH – Yes, especially with the family law folks, cause you have the family law facilitator. So if we’re referring someone, it’s usually directly to the facilitator rather than to the law library. But I must admit, you heard me earlier talking about the clerk…I have done that, and I know other family law attorneys have, and we’re fortunate to have an attorney…
AMG – You’re very fortunate…
DH – In Butte County, and someone who is so committed to public access of the law library and generally interested in helping people. So I have referred people here.
AMG – So that would seem to say that if we were looking at why an individual or agency might refer somebody, that it’s the quality of assistance that they might be receiving as a result?
DH – Definitely. Plus the fact that for any questions they have, the books are right there.
AMG – It’s kind of having someone as an intermediary sometimes between the question and the book.
DH – That’s a big service that you see John doing. People have a heck of a time finding a book to open to read it. So that’s why the assistance of a librarian can be so valuable.
AMG – Let me circle back to that other question that came up…John you were talking about the issue of the court clerks really having it drilled into them…they cannot answer any of these questions…and it sounds like in your case they’re told that they can’t even recommend to someone what packet to buy or paperwork they need to fill out or something…and that certainly I know is a hallmark of many court clerk systems, and frankly it is say of public libraries in general. But there is this really strong feeling of you know, don’t cross that line. Appropriately there…I mean you don’t know where you’re going once you cross that line. And the question I guess I would bring up then for you is…are there ways that a county law library can help that middle ground? You are fortunate in that you have an attorney in your county law library…identifying that problem, are there things that a county law library can do or shouldn’t do in that area?
DH – What John mentioned earlier I think, and it’s always hard to delineate the limits. I was married to a court clerk in southern CA when I was practicing down there…on the family law petition, when the grounds stated for dissolution of marriage, they didn’t state what the grounds stood for, it was just the code section…one for irreconcilable differences and one was for incurable insanity. The form didn’t say which code section referred to which. The people would come in to fill out forms and ask the clerk, which one is irreconcilable differences? And the clerks were instructed to say, I can’t tell you that. I think that’s where you’re so rigidly afraid of doing anything that you’re really not providing any assistance. So that’s on one end of the spectrum I think, but then on the other end is telling somebody what the elements of a cause of action are or what provisions should be in a marital settlement…where you’re clearly practicing law. In-between, there are non-attorney individuals who have a lot of knowledge of what is what, it’s almost of a clerical nature, they can say, this is what this form is designed to do, but I can’t help you fill it out.
AMG – There’s two code sections, this is what this code section says, this is what the other says, now you have to figure out which one you want but here’s the two code sections.
DH – Yes, just a statement of fact to be referred to…like, this packet is for domestic violence, this packet is for legal separation, or anything else, and to just state as a fact what it is for, I don’t think that anybody, other than clerks who are afraid of getting in trouble with a superior…I think there’s a lot of information that can be provided…like issues dealing with foreclosure of a house…just direct them to the right set of books, show them the table of contents…you’re not rendering legal advice but instead providing a very valuable service. That’s the kind of thing I can almost guarantee a clerk would not do because they would be afraid that answering any question other than what’s the fee for filing this, any question beyond that gets into some kind of discretion.
JAZ – One man had a judgment for paternity declaring he was the father, and he got a paternity packet from the clerk, but he should have gotten an order to show cause packet from the clerk. The paternity packet did not include the form need for modification of custody or establishment of order. I see a timestamp on the clerk’s receipt of 3:38 pm, and the clerk would not get him a substitute…
DH – Yes, no refunds or exchanges.
JAZ – I went to Judge Roberts when she had her chambers back there and I said, I almost went and got them and just gave them packets, I just thought that was so, was such a mechanical application of the rules…I could see a specific purpose…our public comes in all shapes here…somebody could take out the form they need, hand back the packet to the clerk and get a refund, and then the clerk hands it out to someone else and it’s missing a page. That’s a real clear reason to make no refunds on these packets, but they could ask just one question…like do you already have a paternity order? And if he had said yes, the clerk would have known immediately to give him an order to show cause. That’s what I’m creating here in the library…little how to reference guides just like that…the only one I have that’s finished now is the one on expunging a misdemeanor off of the records. I leave the patron to process through the codes and check the boxes, write a little statement on the back…go on…this is how you get it served, this is how you get it back to the clerk…you don’t have to provide all the information, but there is a format for doing it. Do you want temporary orders…could be a thing. This applies to you, this is the packet you want. This is missing, this is the packet you want. So that we don’t have an episode…the proper role of the county law library is an information provider…I was thinking about the Justice Judicial Council …all of the attendees have a binder 3-4" thick full of material with a cover letter expressing that the county library is not administratively under the court…it’s its own little entity of local government, half of the board of trustees being responsible for supervisors, half being responsible for the courts. If this information is funneled more through the county law library, than from the clerk, it removes that possibility that the court is giving assistance to maybe one of two litigants…I’m just throwing that out…
AMG – If this county law library were able to add materials or services, are there specific ones that you can think of that would be helpful to you or say other individuals who might use the library services…or not use them now but might use them then?
DH – The family law practice…the facilitator…provides a lot of the services that I would otherwise need the law library for. With my experience at this time, I cannot think of additional resources that I would want to have here. I know something that John has just been dreaming of pushing towards for years…..
~TAPE FLIP~
DH - …our attorneys don’t charge the same fees that are charged in more urban areas, and we’ve been in family law cases etc…we’ve still been taking retainers…where lawyers would think that paralegals would handle those retainers...but all of that’s changing, because even in family law the cases are getting so complicated that in routine matters, there’s so much work that the lawyer has to do, that there was a meeting of family law lawyers cause of the local rules that are coming down, saying that we’re going to have to double our retainers through all of the procedural obstacles that need to be negotiated. And so, as a result of that, I think even the need in Butte County is going to skyrocket, and to have the law library as an environment where people can come in and get the help they need to be able to go into court and feel comfortable, that at least they’ll be able to present their case in such a way that the judge hears what they’re saying. And so, in an environment where clinics can be put on…
AMG – So basically, I think what I hear you saying is that there are things that are happening within the context that you can practice law that may drive some needs within the law library services.
DH – Yes. And especially if my perspective should be beyond Butte County…I forget that, I practiced quite a bit in Lassen County and to a certain extent in Glenn County…there are just not that many lawyers there to start with. They seem to have a much higher percentage of self-represented litigants that really don’t have anywhere to go, so a library would be a great source.
JAZ – Automobile accidents or small personal injury…the time required to file a lawsuit where they’ll have to initiate and defend discovery and subpoena witnesses…that is an area where I just don’t have enough time to walk through it…if I were to attend workshops I would perhaps be able to serve a population, but individually, those cases require so much time that that is a need that must be met somehow…
DH – When my practice was more general, I would get a couple of calls a month reporting damages…you’re not under the gun on the Statute of Limitations…it’s not where somebody has to get in and get an answer today…if you were doing those every month, or even every three months, you would put people in a position to gain assistance with enough time to protect their rights.
AMG – Interesting…so in this small niche that seems to be falling out, there might be a role for the county law library. Obviously, technology has changed how all libraries operate…law libraries being the types of libraries that are impacted by this…are there any types of technologies or computer systems or the like that would be helpful to you if the law library could add them?
DH – I would love to have more access to law reviews. In family law especially, the really interesting articles are not in Harvard or Stanford where you would expect to find easy access. So I would like to see that, and it’s easy to justify subscribing to law reviews…and so that’s something that I would like. Not so much as the primary authority cases or the codes…we have all of that, it’s the secondary resources that we would probably find most helpful.
JAZ – I have the entire database of journals and periodicals that are CA originated that I can get at no extra cost…it won’t cost us anything more than an operational printer. Through the Library of CA, there is something called Gail Reference Center Gold, I don’t know entirely what’s in it, Terry Siemas down at the public library would know that, but as a member, I have full text access to a lot of periodicals out there that the state just gives us. So when I start identifying what those are, Gail Reference Center Gold may already give me full text access…
AMG – Let me ask you about the physical setup of the law libraries. Is there anything within this room itself that you find works particularly well or not well?
DH – The one thing I think of every time that I’m in here is the noise…the conversation. I love the fact that it’s okay to talk, but when I’m really trying to get some research done, especially if I’m getting a headache and I can’t understand what I’m reading…
JAZ – That’s been something that I think is number one in here is to create some environment of quiet…I’ve given the trustees two different proposals for dividing this room including a quiet room in the back where Gary and Leslie’s office opens up into it, and that’s where the CEB and Matthew Bender and loose leaves would be. We could take out the copy machine, hoping to find one table along the window back here that won’t be disrupted.
DH – That’s a good aspect, because that way I can come in when I’m photocopying and still chat with people, but something nice is to be able to go back and have a window…for the light and to do some thinking is very helpful. The stacks diminish the noise some, but a lot of the people like me have voices that tend to carry, so it is not conducive to deep thought.
AMG – Just in terms of location…any comments about the actual location, the fact that it’s…pros or cons? Anywhere else you’d like to see it located?
DH – If I were being selfish I would want it in Chico because I am in Chico, but most of the lawyers in court are here 2-3 times a week, which provides them enough time to get to the library.
AMG – How long of a drive is it from Chico to here?
DH – About 20 mins.
AMG – Yeah, that’s what I was thinking.
DH – Yeah, I think it would be unfortunate to relocate the law library.
AMG – My next question actually we talked about before…I’m trying to find out if people know how their county law library is funded. One of the things we’re finding is that most people don’t know, even people that regularly use the law library, where the funding is coming from. I don’t remember what the numbers are, but a very significant portion of county law libraries are reporting up to a 25% decrease in the filing fee revenue in the last 5 years, which is a result of lowered numbers of filings.
DH – Not a result of more fee waivers?
AMG – Um, I think it’s the combination…we didn’t test why exactly, but certainly the conversation at the meeting awhile ago was more about fee waivers than anything else. So obviously one of the issues you’re facing at the county law libraries is, is there a different combination of funding sources that we can or should be looking for?
DH – The thing is, they don’t look at something that’s directly user-tied. I would hate to see a charge being imposed on someone who was actually using the library, because one of the problems you have with the community using it is, it’s so hard to get the word out into the public as to what resources are available to them. Especially being here by the courthouse, it’s not an area where people necessarily want to come. Even a slight charge to someone is an impediment.
AMG – There are a number in the state that are not in the courthouse. Alameda moved out of the courthouse about two years ago I think.
DH – I knew that because I went to court and saw some points of authorities filed by the DA and realized that I hadn’t read one of the cases, and I was surprised to find that the library was not in the building. It was close enough though that I could research it and still get back to court in time.
AMG – But for you the point is that you would still need to be able to bring materials to court with you?
DH – Yes. Because when things come up and you’re making the argument in court, it’s nice to have the books there to read from…and as long as that would not be a problem...it’s also really convenient when there’s downtime waiting for court to be called to be reading, but when you’re between calendars, to be down the hill could be difficult.
AMG – Well actually more and more libraries of all types are looking at creating more comfortable spaces, not necessarily throughout the library, but more in a portion of the library.
DH – Oh the Barnes and Noble Attempt?
AMG – Absolutely. Well you know, that’s what our public now knows.
JAZ – The Fairfax County Public Library in VA, they’ve dedicated…they have a fourteen branch system…they have a Starbuck’s in one of them.
AMG – John, is yours one of the libraries that has seen a decrease in filing fees in the last 5 years?
JAZ – Well yes, we remedied that with a filing fee increase twice in the last 5 years going from 20 to 23 in 1986 and 23 to 26…actually the number of dollars…I want to qualify what I just said…the actual filing fees have not really gone down, actually last year they went up by 7% before the pay increase…as it turned out because of the better job the selection department does of selecting filing fees. I had maybe $7000 in unexpected income, but the price of legal publications, I know the AA and LL…I did my own actual invoices, and the price of law books here using 10 representative titles was something like 22% increase over the last 4-5 years to pay for the very same selection without buying one new book. Well when filing fees are flat, things have to be cut…I eliminated $17000 dollars worth of subscriptions in here within the last year, going from $90000 in subscriptions down to nearly $70000.
AMG – Given what John has just said, do you have any perceptions then about how maybe your use of the county law library may have changed as a result of that? Or maybe it hasn’t.
DH – My having access to more resources…
AMG – When did weekend access end?
DH – I think with security, when you got keys on Friday and brought them back on Monday.
JAZ – It was a glorious system, it was great, and I have always been trying to push for a renewal of that system, even if it means a new entrance…cause if you move down the hill that ends the security because it’s cool when people can open the doors more.
AMG – Well you know, one of the interesting things in libraries is, the most expensive part of any library is the collection. So the fewer hours that you’re open, the less you’re actually utilizing that expensive resource. I mean, if you look around this room, can you imagine what’s invested in this collection?
JAZ – I know what’s in this collection. Half a million dollars would buy what’s in here plus about $90000 a year to maintain it…I only have about $80000.
DH – So 15 hours a day it’s asleep…it’s like being offline.
AMG – It’s interesting that you said that about it being offline…cause basically what you said before about Internet access is that it has really changed your habits of legal access…at least in part?
DH – Oh more than in part. Because with the library being open only from 8-5, those are my court hours.
AMG – Any other general comments?
DH – No…a concern after John and I talked about me being here…a concern that I should have talked off the record of…I don’t want anybody to get the impression that we’re so pleased with our law library that we don’t need more assistance, because any additional resources that would be available, I know John would put them to good use.
AMG – Well I think you can rely on me not to tell everyone that everything is wonderful here. I think you’ve done an extraordinary job with the resources at your disposal compared to other more rural counties. But that’s not to say that you’re really where you need to be. Particularly actually I’m glad to hear you refer back to the need of the lay user, not just the legal community. One of the problems that I think a lot of the county law libraries have is that much of their communities are not aware that they are there.
DH – Yeah, that’s a tough position for the lawyer to be in…when I come in, we have two sets of the family law, I would come in before when we only had one set, and the volume I needed was being used by the lay person…and of course there’s the initial response…gosh I wish they’d leave. Once you get over that initial irritation, you realize what everything here is supposed to be serving. I’m glad to see this used by lay people as often as attorneys, doing real substantial research.
JAZ – And I thought that was a good expenditure of the money, as I did acquiring Deerings.
DH – There was a time, in the more severe cutbacks, when we eliminated one of the sets of codes and we stopped updating. And that really bothered me, and I assumed we did it because West is tied more into other things. But it was really nice to get them both back, because I was one of the people that was really upset when they took away Deerings.
AMG – Well I understand, it’s not a totally subtle difference, but not an exactly obvious one either.
DH – Yeah, you’d think they’re codes, they’ve got annotations, who cares which one you have?
JAZ – My legal research teacher in library school, her name is my computer password to this day…and we did a Shepherd’s assignment where we Shepherdized the Michigan Official Codes…remembering that is what made me, when I got here, really make sure we got the Deerings and the West systems to research simultaneously.
AMG – Well thank you for your time. I appreciate it.
JAZ – Dinner at the Red Tavern courtesy of the Law Library Trustees. Thank you for your time.
FACILITATOR COMMENTS:
JAZ is Butte County Law Library Director John Zorbas, who served as recorder and transcriber for the focus group. The other participant is an attorney in private practice. The law library is located in the courthouse and has a good sized collection. The focus group was scheduled quickly which resulted in low attendance.
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Humboldt County Law Library, Eureka
COUNTIES COVERED: Humboldt
DATE: July 19, 2001
FACILITATOR: Anne Marie Gold
ATTENDANCE: 9
A. GENERAL
Participants included:
Attorney in private practice
Public interest attorney
Public Defender
District Attorney
Judge (Law Library Board member)
Legal Aid Attorney
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
C. WRAP UP
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
The attendees at the focus group represented a good cross section of law library users in Humboldt County but did not include any representatives from other counties. The general sense was that while the law library provides useful services, use has declined from the legal community because of access to digital resources elsewhere. There was concern about the relocation of the law library after the renovation.
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Los Angeles County Law Library, Los Angeles
COUNTIES COVERED: Los Angeles
DATE:
June 28, 2001 10:00amFACILITATOR: Anne Campbell
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 7
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Law Librarian
Attorneys from law firms
Attorney in private practice
Major user of the Law Library, interested in helping staff.
Wanted to provide input into the future of law library, esp. because everything the law library has to give up, their law firm has to pick up.
Los Angeles County Law Library is considered one of the largest and best law libraries in the United States.
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Use the Law Library several times a day.
Use the Law Library for first and second level reference services, esp. in areas that the firm/attorneys are not familiar with.
Use for legal information for other U.S. states.
Use the foreign country legal information, and the excellent assistance of the foreign law librarian.
The foreign/international collection is only available at Law Library. This material is not available online, and it is not available at any other library.
Use for specialty law.
Use the services daily, esp. to phone for materials.
Use the online catalog.
All who attended use the library.
Usually the Law Library supplies the phone number of the agency or organization to contact directly for the information.
Use UCLA, USC and Los Angeles PL, Cal State LA.
Use RLIN.
Depends on who asks. Mostly will do research for attorneys, but send summer interns to do own work.
Will refer attorneys if project very extensive.
Usually law clerks and attorneys get excellent assistance at the Law Library.
Often have the index of book by fax and then attorney can determine the parts they need.
Faster fax services and more than 20 page limit.
Would pay extra for "rush" service.
Online reserves and holds.
Ability to place more than two books on hold (esp. if sending a courier).
Some wanted renewals, some argued against.
Retrospective conversion of older materials, could then use online catalog to locate.
Tours for summer interns, attorneys and the public (virtual tour?).
Overnight circulation of noncirculating materials (would pay large deposit for this service).
Need catalog instruction classes.
Would like access to circulation records, esp. helpful in knowing what attorneys have checked out and what is late. (Problem getting some attorneys to return books)
Like Orange County law Library website and catalog, seems easier to use than Los Angeles.
Additional links embedded in subject search.
Several participants indicated the online catalog was difficult to use. Several find the legislative information makes the "practice" materials difficult to find.
Lots of closed stacks that have limited access.
Use of fiche and film is not comfortable.
Parking difficult.
Library does an excellent job of handling the many vagrants that want to use the Law Library to keep warm/sleep/etc.
Yes, most were aware of the funding.
Have not seen a decrease in hours or services.
Have seen some of the international materials are not up to date.
C. WRAP UP
Please do not decrease the collection, hours or staff. This Law Library is vital!!
Most indicated willingness for their law firms to pay for services.
Would pay for the quality of staff.
"I am at their mercy, I would pay anything."
Further discussion on sliding scales…paying for higher levels of service…
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Los Angeles County Law Library, Los Angeles
COUNTIES COVERED: Los Angeles
DATE: June 28, 2001 2:00pm
FACILITATOR: Anne Campbell
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 5
A. GENERAL
Attendees:
Law Librarian
Attorneys from law firms
Los Angeles County Law Library has one of the best collections in the country! Want to help the staff.
Depend on the Law Library, want to help.
Knew about Los Angeles County Law Library while living in Oklahoma!
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Use for second level reference, excellent staff (brainy and creative). They are "unbelievable."
Staff able to find the most obscure materials.
Use Law Library once or twice a week.
Use daily for phone reference, sometimes call twice a day.
Use for historical legal materials.
Use for international law.
Use legislative history and esoteric legal materials.
Use phone reference and use fax service.
Only use the phone reference. Have used the Law Library for five years and today is the first actual visit!
Use for "bizarre stuff", often use international materials, i.e. American Samoa.
Use older materials, the things that can’t keep at law firm because of space.
Many materials can’t get at any other library.
Everyone uses.
Use UCLA.
Use OCLC for interlibrary loan.
Use SCALL listserve.
Use OCLC, First Search service.
Sometimes get materials from other offices of our law firm.
Refer attorneys for more in-depth research.
Many attorneys don’t like to use Law Library; don’t get the level of service they are accustomed to from the librarians at the firm (want to be coddled).
Refer summer interns for research projects.
Would like to have longer documents faxed.
Want ability to check out more books.
Increase size of international collection, esp. translations.
Additional state materials, esp. materials that compare states.
Additional practice guides for all states. Law firms are all competing for same business, are not only doing California and federal, also take cases in other states. Many firms are multi-state and need to have other state materials.
More lenient check out of materials, esp. international materials.
Frequently want to check out reference materials. Would like to be able to check out those materials, even if only overnight.
Discussions regarding overdue fines…attorneys don’t take them seriously.
Would like ability to reserve online.
Ability to check circulation records online.
Would like more general reference materials online (like LAPL).
Even librarians find the Law Library online catalog difficult to use.
Would like a better interface to the Law Library collection.
Like the link to ballot propositions.
Most knew how funded.
The collection is not as up to date, esp. state specific information.
The collection is somewhat neglected.
C. WRAP UP
The Los Angeles County Law Library has a classification system that predates L.C. for legal materials. Other County Law Libraries use the same classification system.
General discussion regarding the ability of law firms to pay for Law Library services.
Many indicated a willingness to pay for an even higher level of service…sliding scale…raise fees…
Is there a Friends group to help raise money?
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Orange County Law Library, Santa Ana
COUNTIES COVERED: Orange County
DATE: June 14, 2001
FACILITATOR: Anne Campbell
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 9
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Legal Aid
Public Law Center
Superior Court Clerk
Attorney in private practice
Law Librarian
District Attorney-Family Support
To learn more about the library.
To learn more about technology use at the law library. Working on a public access kiosk project and wondered about law library’s role in community. Exciting time for libraries.
Talked to law library personnel and wanted to learn more about library.
Use the library so much, wanted to endorse the services, collection and staff.
Use library’s website as portal to legal information.
Use several times a week.
Mainly refer people to law library.
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Use the library often, usually several times a week.
Use the library when really need a quiet place to work(no distractions).
Several expressed concern about theft of materials (esp. pages taken from books).
Several expressed that they mainly used print collection and were "not up to speed with technology". Could courses be offered by library?
Several expressed that they use the Continuing Education for the Bar audiotapes, either personally or refer other lawyers.
Public Law Center and Legal Aid mainly refer people to law library. They have regular legal clinics and would like to explore doing clinics at the law library.
Several expressed they use the "practice guides".
Find research online faster than going to library, but expressed "fondness" for books.
Sometimes go to governmental agencies that have involvement in area of interest.
If can’t find at the library then next best place is "associate"(personal network).
Use law school libraries (USC, Whittier).
Public Law Center and Legal Aid refer people to the law library.
Legal Aid can only help 20% of those in need, those they can’t help they refer to law library.
Refer for research, and for background information on legal process.
Low literate and non-English speakers have further barriers to legal information. Asked what information available in other languages.
Consumer law (debt collection, warranty issues).
Pricing of electronic information can be a barrier for small law firms and Legal Aid. Could a consortium use their power to reduce costs?
Online research classes.
Lunchtime presentations through Bar Association.
Are videos available for CEB classes? Might be more accessible than audiotapes.
Direct line to Lawyers Referral Service.
Technology sometimes the most cost effective way to obtain materials. Can download specific sections to disk and then use later at office/home.
Online research classes.
Classes can create too much noise. Pro pers (self-help patrons) don’t use the resources as intended (take reference guides out of area). Pro pers can often have emotional problems that cause them to "act out", creating distractions. Want quiet areas.
Need better copiers (two requests).
Need to improve outside of building (esp. empty water feature).
Location is very difficult, esp. when need to give directions to clients.
Bar dues?
Board of Supervisors?
Expressed surprise at the actual funding source and brainstormed ideas to help: start Friends of the Library group; sell donated books; fundraising/partner with Bar Association.
Appears that collections have increased.
Appears that services have increased, esp. technology.
C. WRAP UP
Collect materials for pro pers in one area, creating a "Self Help Center".
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Placer County Law Library, Auburn
COUNTIES COVERED: Placer, Yuba
DATE: June 26, 2001
FACILITATOR: Linda Crowe
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 6
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Public Library librarian
Law librarian
Court staff
Attorney in private practice
"Chris asked us to come; we refer people to the library." Yuba County librarian just appointed county law librarian (want to understand what to do); attorney refers clients here and also pro pers; civil courts, especially family law, refer pro pers
Some research; meetings here; refer people from public library; one participant never; very familiar
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Never use/refer; staff meetings, 2/month; about once/week
Computers; conference room; Deerings; daily journals; Yuba County Library has form books and Deerings
One participant doesn’t need resources -- sends people for forms.
It is extremely helpful that Chris Christman, County Law Librarian, is an attorney.
Landlord/tenant cases; real estate; probate; patents; domestic violence; family law; small claims; appeals; pleading papers
Unlimited online access to legal databases; Yuba County concerned about lack of trained staff; need trained staff; judicial counsel forms; self-help center with Nolo books in separate space for public users
Weak in federal law secondary sources; criminal law weak; more staff -- library is open 55 hours/week with one full-time librarian; 1-1/2 assistant, and on-call staff
Enough public terminals; Nolo books on CD that would help pro pers through process; there is Quicken Family Lawyer that walks pro pers through wills, etc.; keep software updated; scanners; this law library has good balance between print and electronic resources; adding Internet access to all computers with InFoPeople special grant
Location ideal; good parking; easy to find; need higher shelves and more shelves
Civil filing fee -- last year increased $3. Placer receives $3 plus the baseline $20 = $23. It is possible to increase fee $3/year by decision of Board of Supervisors. In 1992 filing fees were doubled, but baseline $20 to law libraries remained the same.
Although the number of filings is generally down in California, Placer County’s have increased for the last four years. Even with this increase, the law library is spending down its reserve. Need increase to keep resources--print and electronic--up to date.
C. WRAP UP
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS
A participant described the law library 10 years ago as "pathetic," but it is now a model for smaller law libraries. All participants agree that this is because of Chris Christman, the county law librarian. He moved the library into its present attractive new quarters and selected a balanced collection, both print and electronic. It is critical that a solution to the funding issues be found for law libraries and especially for libraries like Placer that serve as a model for smaller counties.
There is a common thread in focus groups about a self-help center in the library for the public with Nolo Press books and other tools for pro pers.
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Riverside County Law Library, Riverside
COUNTIES COVERED: Riverside, San Bernardino
DATE: June 22, 2001
FACILITATOR: Anne Campbell
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 11
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Law Librarians
Public Library Librarians
Paralegal
County Counsel
Academic Librarian
Exec. Dir. County Bar Assn./Attorney
County residents- nonusers
Attorney in private practice
Staff is excellent, wanted to assist them in planning for future.
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Attorneys use Riverside County law Library, rather than San Bernardino (where they practice) because find it more comfortable and staff more helpful.
Use staff to assist with research.
Use the Library for CEB tapes.
Use phone service, with fax response.
Attorney has all the legal information he needs in his office.
Refer people from the public library on a daily basis.
Language and literacy can be a barrier for people to access legal information.
Update and expand collection of CEB tapes.
Sell forms for pro pers. Would be even better if could actually file the papers from the Law Library.
Additional civil procedures materials (Rutter).
CEB books.
Additional hours, including hours until 9pm in the evening and longer hours on Saturday.
Would be interested in classes in using electronic information for legal research.
Need more areas to hold conversations (in person and on phone).
Would like to use conference rooms without a charge.
Parking is awful at Riverside County Law Library, parking better in San Bernardino.
Most were not aware of funding.
Library started to charge for conference room use.
No apparent decline in service, in fact see more electronic information.
C. WRAP UP
Need to market services (through utility bills/Chamber of Commerce?), make public aware the Library is a free public library. Use Tele-Law service to advertise Law Library.
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
Recorder failed to capture all comments.
Difficult to discuss two counties at one focus group.
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Sacramento County Law Library
COUNTIES COVERED: Sacramento, Yolo, Stanislaus
DATE: July 9, 2001
FACILITATOR: Anne Marie Gold
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 12
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Law firm librarian
Law library librarian
Paralegal
Attorney in private practice
District attorney
Judge
Law library board member
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
C. WRAP UP
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: San Diego County Law Library, Main Branch
COUNTIES COVERED: San Diego
DATE: June 16, 2001
FACILITATOR: Anne Campbell
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 14
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Attorneys
Law Librarians
Public Library Librarians
Disabled Advocate
Pro pers
Prison Librarians
Paralegal
Wanted to support great staff.
Came to find out more about services.
Know they have essentials.
Public awareness of collections and services is lacking.
Attorney that went to law school in another state indicated that they only had access to law school library; no public law libraries were available.
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Use library for legal research for criminal cases several times a month. The staff is "magnificent"!
As a community college professor, use the library as a resource for paralegal students (arrange annual tour).
Donovan Prison librarian uses the County Law Library to supplement the prison library collection. Use reference services, esp. fax services.
The librarian from one of the largest law firms indicated that they use the collections to supplement the firm’s library.
Pro per indicated he used the library several times a week. Thinks general public unaware of the library and the services.
Pro per uses the library weekly for research. Has learned much from the wonderful library staff.
Librarian from San Diego Public uses the law library to obtain materials for disabled patrons.
Disabled individual indicated the building was out of compliance for ADA.
Several times a month uses the services of the reference staff to locate information unable to locate online from his office.
Librarians always able to find answers, even when patron ready to give up.
Most of the public knows little about the law library, esp. that it is open to the public and available for legal research.
Disabled would be unable to access most of the collections.
Have materials need from own collection, although partner uses several times a week.
Sometimes use gov’t doc depository library at San Diego Public Library.
Go directly to governmental agency that has information.
Uses law school libraries (USD and Cal Western).
Refer people from Chula Vista Public Library to the County Law Library. Many are Spanish speaking.
Refer people from San Diego County libraries, esp. when Nolo books are inadequate.
Public Librarians that refer patrons to law library need better orientation to collections and services available.
Additional hours: Sunday hours, evening hours, early morning.
More federal materials.
Multimedia (virtual) tour of the library to provide introduction to collections and services.
Provide maps of collections and self help guides.
Have bilingual staff.
Make library ADA compliant (could not even get in front door).
Expand programs that assist with teaching public how to use materials.
Reduce copier costs.
Additional staff to expand teaching programs.
Need easy user guide to cd-rom products. Need more guides or classes to electronic information in the library.
Need online catalog.
Touch screens and self help guides would increase staff efficiency.
Upgrade technology.
Several participants indicated that they were computer illiterates.
Parking is a huge problem downtown.
Library not easy for disabled. Need to be ADA compliant.
Some areas comfortable (California Room and Upper Reading Room) but need better signage.
Have to ask staff to find things. Would like a guide so can use library self-directed.
City tax?
Board of Supervisors?
Many unaware of funding and had suggestions for better funding: Local or CA State Bar Association assist with funding through dues structure; funding from law schools/universities/community colleges.
Cutback hours.
Fewer materials.
Suggested add services with cost recovery (i.e. Practice guides online).
C. WRAP UP
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
Very diverse group (attorneys/public library librarians/law firm librarians/pro pers/paralegals).
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: San Diego County Law Library, Vista
COUNTIES COVERED: San Diego
DATE: June 21, 2001
FACILITATOR: Anne Campbell
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 5
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Attorney in private practice
Attorney in law firm
Legal Aid
Learn more about the library.
Attorney in private practice has used Law Library since law school.
Work in agency that refers clients to Law Library.
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Uses research materials and practice guides several times a month.
Use the library several times a week to do research for cases and uses practice guides.
Usually come about three times a month.
The librarians are legal research experts and always find the answer.
One attorney does not like to ask for help, would prefer more self help guides.
Attorney with a large firm that has an adequate law library. Might call for a reference consultation, esp. with federal or out-of-state materials.
Usually get help from other agencies or other attorneys.
Law Library has obtained books on interlibrary loan for attorney.
Sometimes materials are out of date and then
Refer people for landlord-tenant cases, family law and traffic tickets.
Often refer to Nolo Press materials.
Although refer people to library not really familiar with all collections and services.
Refer Spanish speakers-do they get help they need?
One attorney refers people that can’t afford his legal fees.
Additional hours, esp. weekend hours.
Working people can’t use the library because of the hours. Need evening and weekend hours.
Jury verdicts on cd-rom.
DissoMaster for general use. At the Courthouse only the attorneys can use.
Attorney uses online information from office. Finds many free resources online.
Attorney uses online resources at work, but comes to Law Library for print. Some legal research easier to do in print.
Would like to see forms available online that could be filled out and printed.
Copiers easy to use and cost is reasonable.
Restrooms always kept clean.
Nice that you can use conference room for depositions, conferences and mediations.
Public Library?
Special tax?
Only one person knew the Library funded with civil filing fees.
Discussion regarding other sources of funding: property tax, County General Fund, user-based tax, County Library funding, donation through CA state tax, bake sales.
Concern expressed that user fees create barrier to information.
Have not noticed decreased services.
Finds many books not updated.
Five years ago there was a decrease in services, but seems better now.
C. WRAP UP
If need to make cuts would prefer cuts to hours, rather than materials.
Need to keep practice books current.
Cutting hours adversely affects pro pers.
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: San Francisco County Law Library, San Francisco
COUNTIES COVERED: San Francisco
DATE: June 20, 2001
FACILITATOR: Linda Crowe
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 12
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Public agency attorney
Attorney in private practice
User
Resource is indispensable; want to speak up about it; concerned about library’s letter to public (under siege); afraid library will be marginalized; need complete collection--not just electronic resources; "gold in here"
Group made up of: 2 public librarians, 10 lawyers, 2 law librarians
All are familiar with the library.
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
1-3 days per week; all at least weekly.
West vs. official publications; how-to books; casebooks; codes (Witkin); Official Reporter; secondary resources; CA Jur; Am Jur
Local materials include SF Bay/CA materials (not found in academic libraries), e.g., water law, city reports; Bancroft Whitney Pubs; some law reviews
Use has changed since mid-70s -- basics (Witkin, etc.) in office; rest in archives; law reviews, Congressional materials
N/A
Hastings; USF, Boalt, Golden Gate University, Alameda County LL; U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit; "just give up"
Yes – Small claims; information and lawyer referral forms; Nolo Press books; form books; codes and reports
No – Don’t feel clients/public are knowledgeable enough to use it.
Section for average person/consumer away from others with Nolo section, etc.; professional volunteer to assist pro pers; complete set of West Reporter and regionals; Lexis/Nexis at branch.
Not updating some series at branch; Patent and Maritime resources inadequate; copy machines a problem at branch; materials on criminal law and immigration inadequate (Norton Tooby titles).
A concierge/greeter; Forecite Dictionary for Occupational Services; library needs home under one roof; permanent home and materials in storage retrieval.
Yes – Portion of filing fees (declining).
Used to have benefactor who donated rare books and a "friends group."
S.F. fees are low because of population relative to Alameda County.
C. WRAP UP
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS
There was some discussion about the librarians "practicing law" to general public. Described by one participant as the first station to solving legal problems. However,
this is "not legal," and there is certainly a question about how far a librarian can go.
This is a group of very interested, supportive users, mostly attorneys. The Law Library is fighting for a permanent home and is finding it difficult to receive a commitment from the Mayor. The 13-member board is well placed and needs to pressure the City. Support from the users may become necessary, and the librarian looks to mobilize them. This same thread--users as advocates--was suggested in San Mateo focus group.
Again, the users of the San Francisco County Law Library are avid about its benefits to them and feel it is essential to their work.
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: San Mateo County Law Library, Redwood City
COUNTIES INCLUDED: San Mateo and Monterey
DATE: May 19, 2001
FACILITATOR: Linda Crowe
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 6
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Law Library Board trustee
Law Library staff
User
There were two members of the public who regularly use the library: two attorneys and two county law librarians; no non-users.
All of the participants felt comfortable with the law library.
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
All use the library at least 1/week or more, up to 3-4 times/week. They use:
The law librarians feel they provide "directional assistance." Try not to do research since this is considered "crossing the line."
If users know what they want, they usually find it themselves.
N/A – All are library users.
Yes, all the time and bring people as well. Recommend people look at local codes, e.g.,
Public: Additional pay phone
Extend hours
Law Librarian: Archives – more historical materials
New carpeting
Self-help books
Attorney’s needs
More computer terminals
Librarian: DSL lines
Easy: Conference room
Library very spacious
Computers – web page – is a directional page with rules – staff – directional tool
Hard: Sitting next to windows (need reinforcing since ’89 earthquake)
California Code – not always available; tends to disappear
First filing fees (Civil-A portion) are main income.
C. WRAP UP
This discussion should be used to help convince Board of Supervisors what the needs are. They should provide a base level of funding and take the filing fees. If filing fees don’t equal base funding, the Supervisors should absorb the deficit.
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
Both public members were strong advocates for the County Law Library, and using these advocates to "lobby" for County Law Libraries might be a way to raise awareness of how important the County Law Library is to those who need it and use it. This might be on local or state level.
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Santa Barbara County Law Library, Santa Barbara
COUNTIES COVERED: Santa Barbara, Ventura
DATE: June 30, 2001
FACILITATOR: Anne Campbell
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 6
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Law Librarians
Public Library Librarians
Attorney/paralegal professor
Attorney
Superior Court Self Help Center staff
The Law Library staff has been so helpful, wanted to help them.
Have worked at public library for 21 years, and as a Federal Depository Library had assisted the Law Library. The public library gave up status of depository in 1999 and that has impacted public library and Law Library.
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Teach paralegal class at the Law Library.
Use the law Library for Codes and research.
Refer for "Forms of pleading and practice."
Refer for Nolo materials and United States codes.
Refer from the public library; sometimes call ahead to alert them.
Language and literacy can be a barrier to use legal materials. Very little available in Spanish.
More hours.
More computers and more databases.
National agency materials.
Public relations campaign to advertise Law Library as "user friendly".
Problem to use some databases with public. License agreement only allows staff to use.
Need to have online catalog. Ventura uses LA County Law Library cataloging scheme, but only has card catalog.
Santa Barbara has an automated inventory and catalog. They use LA County law Library cataloging.
Santa Barbara Law Library in the beautiful and historic Court House, but space is very limited. Parking difficult.
Ventura has a nice facility, but very difficult to find the front door. Parking difficult.
Good to provide free conference rooms.
*General discussion regarding public perception that all law libraries are only for those in legal profession, and the public is not welcome.
Users were not aware of funding.
Reductions in print collection.
In Ventura had reductions in collection, hours and staff.
C. WRAP UP
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
Interesting discussion regarding the Ventura County Self Help Center funded from the Superior Court. In many ways they are providing services that duplicate the Law Library, but they are a mobile unit (so can go to neighborhoods) and have attorneys that can help and give advise.
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Sonoma County Law Library, Santa Rosa
COUNTIES COVERED: Marin, Sonoma, Lake, Napa
DATE: June 22, 2001
FACILITATOR: Linda Crowe
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 14
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
County Counsel
Law library staff
Legal Aid
Paralegal
Court staff
Attorney in private practice
County law libraries under pressure; fall-off in revenue; increase in pro pers; Marilyn said to come; to get information about services and answer questions for referrals; need and like this resource; refer people here; self-help access; project refers pro pers here; students at USF do research and depend on this library; Napa Co. Law Library going through changes, need good public access
Tour of resources; use it moderately; use it all the time
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Here weekly, monthly, every day when in court
Use: Shepherds; federal cases; treatises; law review; practice guides; form books; pleadings, electronic resources; factual research; attorneys; exhibit collection (graphic, exhibits); conference rooms; faxing service--staff mentioned several times
N/A
Marin County Law Library (after hours and weekends)
Online – backup resources from other law libraries
Use this library only
Davis; S.F. State; Boalt (Napa County Law Librarian)
Civil cases; landlord/tenant; family law; Nolo Press books; out-of-state cases; treatise; hospital admin. cases; health care; pleadings and practice books; see staff for assistance; people who want to determine rights and liabilities need specific documents; call in reference questions that can be answered on phone; continuing legal education
Hours (unanimous) evening/weekend or both
Lawyers who could give advice – volunteer or paid
Another conference room
More public workstations; automated catalog integrated with public library; more electronic resources; list of databases; Napa, Marin, Lake – no websites
Filing fees for civil cases: $23/filing (will send Marilyn’s chart); library charges for circulating materials; group explored county options for money, e.g., a fee for criminal filings;
Reasons why filing fees are decreasing:
More and more pro pers need more help from staff; shrinking resources; focus on fiscal responsibilities; borrowing fee affects user; stopped buying new materials; purchase updates; cut some of less standard materials; can’t move into new areas of law, e.g., senior law (Marin); realize cost for electronic resources limits spending on other materials
C. WRAP UP
much pressure to move in that direction; need a govt. "legal good samaritan law"
are from outside county (serve 4 counties)
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS
This group was very heterogeneous, but all need the law library and were very complimentary about staff. The only person using other law libraries Davis, S.F. State, was law librarian from Napa. The rest depend heavily on their county with Lake Asst. D.A. primarily depending on Sonoma. There was much interest in assisting the law library to stabilize funding for needed resources, including: physical improvements, materials and especially staff. Advocacy is again a "common thread."
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY LAW LIBRARIANS
STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY
Focus Group Report
LOCATION: Tulare County Public Library, Visalia
COUNTIES COVERED: Tulare, Kern, Fresno, Kings
DATE: June 26, 2001
FACILITATOR: Anne Campbell
NUMBER OF ATTENDEES: 11
A. GENERAL
Attendees included:
Attorneys
Law Librarians
Superior Court staff
Public Librarians
Family Law Facilitator
Paralegal
Interested in helping the Law Library
Fairly familiar, use the Library every month.
Refer people, but not really familiar with services or collections.
Have been on the staff of the Library for 30 years and am very familiar.
B. LIBRARY SERVICES/COLLECTIONS/FUNDING
Attorneys use the practice guides.
Use the Law Library for basic legal research. Mostly for own practice, but do some consulting for colleagues. Prefer to use the Library at times when less busy and have more access to materials.
Use the expertise and wisdom of the Law Library staff. Use practice guides, Shepherds, and lots of databases.
The staff is very helpful in locating materials my clients need.
ILL from Los Angeles County Law Library.
Ask for assistance from colleague.
Have approx. 5-10 referrals per week for specific materials that the Library does not have.
Refer people 5-10 times per week.
Many referrals are for people who need help/materials in Spanish.
Refer daily from the Superior Court.
Refer daily from the public library.
When potential client can’t afford legal services, then refer to Law Library.
Pro pers are limited in their ability to use materials by language and literacy level.
One of the problems with referrals is the lack of follow-up…do these people ever get help?
Pro pers almost always want advice, which Law Library staff can’t provide. (Except in Kings County where the Librarian is also the Small Claims Advisor)
Additional hours, esp. nights and Saturdays.
More hours and more staff.
Fresno County could use more electronic information.
More online databases.
More hours, esp. Saturday hours.
Another copier.
Online catalog. At Kings County they have no catalog!
Would like to see Lexus/Nexus access on public workstations.
Public Librarian would like access to the Law Library catalog (online).
Need to have catalog online.
Grateful for InfoPeople grant to put catalog online.
Need both group and one-on-one classes.
Fresno County not comfortable, not good for users or staff.
The fact that the Law Library is located in the Court House makes it totally intimidating for general public.
Kern County has an excellent facility, very inviting. Have a bank of computers.
Tulare has a comfortable facility, but bad acoustics and some space issues.
Not familiar, if not Library staff.
Some collections not updated.
Purchase electronic database and cancel print, unable to purchase both.
See no difference.
Patrons may not be aware until it is bad.
WRAP UP
Suggestion that Law Library be incorporated into public library (city or county). Appears that attorneys are using the Law Library less because of electronic information, but general public using it more. Makes sense to combine with public library.
General public needs legal information without charge. The public needs a sense of justice and to feel that the law works for them.
FACILITATOR’S COMMENTS:
Disparity between large counties and small counties. In Kings County the County Law Librarian is also the Small Claims Court Advisor. The Kings County Law Library has never cataloged the collection (no card catalog/no index). In two of the four counties, attorneys, judges, and others are issued keys to the library.